Humans today have become inextricable with natural resources, so much so that they take from nature what they want and demand it to replenish itself. The concept of biomimicry demands that humans learn to mimic the biological systems of nature. This concept gives way to nature’s principle that waste equals food in that “the very concept of waste does not exist.” (McDonough) From this notion, comes two proposed metabolisms – the biological metabolism (cycles of nature) and the technical metabolism (cycles of industry.)
Cradle-to-cradle is a related concept that opposes the traditional cradle-to-grave production cycle. Cradle-to-cradle works within either a biological metabolism or a technical metabolism and doesn’t consider the life of a product to end with one use. In discussing these concepts, the Roehner video argues that the question isn’t growth or no growth, the question is, can we follow nature’s laws?
I propose that instead of considering one product’s life-cycle, or one company’s product, we challenge the entire manufacturing industry to create a cradle-to-cradle approach. This concept could be considered more biomimetic in that it will mimic an entire ecosystem’s life-cycle, instead of just one individual. For example, as a tree cycles through its stages over the seasons, it is not self-reliant, it instead creates and utilizes the resources of other animals or plants cycles. The manufacturing industry should resemble a thriving ecosystem by working together to fuel each other through its outputs so that nothing goes to waste. This concept incorporates both metabolisms instead of separating the two because the natural outputs and the technical outputs can both be captured and sold to another factory needing the resource.
While designing cradle-to-cradle products themselves is important, on a larger scale it is vital to consider the entire production industry as a cyclical. Competition for resources is traditional, but cooperation is the future.
Hi, Brittney;
ReplyDeleteI think this concept is worth considering further development for your project. You might consider mapping a new supply chain system of the textile industry -- charting material cycles for biological and technical nutrients. Just an idea. I am curious what you think the implications for fashion may be? Will consumers still have their need for newness satisfied in this new system? Or, will they have to change? If so, how will consumers adjust to this new system?
I think that materials and clothing is soon to change anyway based on the limited resources, so consumers options will be changed. In this concept however, I'd consider the least amount of change would be handed down to the consumer because there is less burden from the actual garmet itself by its production and more resources saved because it is higher up the consumption chain.
DeleteBrittney, good blog this week. Thinking about the entire manufacturing realm as a whole instead of single entities is a neat idea. So now, if one industry has a a byproduct that they may not otherwise be able to use, another industry might use it. In your solution, this would be easy.
ReplyDeleteGood job this week! It is clear that you understand the Cradle to Cradle process. You did a good job stating your ideas and explaining the details on how to make it work! Great job!
ReplyDeleteI felt like you really understood the concept of C2C this week and did a great job explaining it to readers... so good job! I do agree that the design concept will need a little more thought and detail added to it. Once tailored, I think your idea has great potential!
ReplyDeleteHey Brittney, its is apparent that you are headed in the right direction with this concept. Maybe next time you could share one way that you plan on implementing this design. How will you approach the manufacturing industry will this idea?
ReplyDelete